Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Nobody Who Knows EveryBody's avatar

The best form of deception is partial truths whether intentional or not.

Look at the data sources and you will see that the percentage of vaccine uptake is displayed on the same graph as the percentage of that vaccine groups representation of all cause mortality.

Had the vaccinated been given pure water the vaccine uptake percentage lines and the proportion of the population represented by the vaccine uptake range would have indeed been the same.

That's the whole point; they are not the same and they are consistently not the same for one dose , two dose and three dose charts and data. In the related Substack for the tiny 0.5% of the all cause deaths that the 18-39 cohort population represent while the same cohort represents 40% of the total 18+ cohort population (Over 19 million people) you see the SAME disproportionate all-cause death charts and Data; AND AGAIN INCEASING WITH DOSE

There is no way for this 18-39 Cohort that one can claim their 0.5% of all cause deaths affected the other 99.5% of all cause deaths in a significant way.

On top of that, even if one DID try to apply the "disproportionate uptake of vaccine" line to say "we are not seeing what we are seeing" you are then faced with everybody seeing what they are seeing even in the young 18-39 year cohort in the subsequent Substack See:

https://open.substack.com/pub/thenobodywhoknowseverybody/p/further-proof-the-age-adjusted-argument

Its not about feelings or bad experiences with some other partial data set from Germany, or from wherever, and its not about applying labels that simply don't hold like "Simpson's paradox"

"Simpson's paradox is a phenomenon in probability and statistics in which a trend appears in several groups of data but disappears or reverses when the groups are combined"

Because the "trend" remained in the 18-39 group as with the"18+ (Combined group).

AND IT MATCHED THE COMMON SENSE HYPOTHESIS

The Substacks are completely transparent and the data sources and working files are there for ALL to review , download and obtain still further charts. There are NO assumptions of vaccine uptake there is just charting of the ACTUAL vaccine uptakes and charting of the ACTUAL corresponding representation of the UPTAKE group's percentage representation of all cause mortality.

The wonderful part of the "England" data is there is no more hiding the Vaccine Uptake figures that were "buried" in the "public domain" in a most obscure inclusion into an ONS data file of a UKHSA Forthnightly National Influenza and COVID-19 Report.

The ONS data file was supposed to represent the data of "Figure 19".

From that figure; one would NEVER have been able to guess that tab of Data in the ONS file for this figure contained the entire England Vaccine Uptake by age groups from the beginning Jan 2021 up until 2nd of July 2023 which more than handsomely covered the period of the ONS All cause mortality Data. It was a cat out of the bag data set!!

I dare say if you could find the same two matching data sources for your Germany data ,which you clearly do not have; hence the wild paradox that you can produce , we could apply the plausible Hypothesis to the properly understood and graphed German data.

See if you can find the data sets and hence eliminate your need for so many assumption and give up on the idea that a Paradox can be allowed to exist when you have the two necessary data sets to hand.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts